I think you don't understand what I'm saying. I'm not saying her points are without merit. Only that I don't believe they are universal which might be implied in the video. I also put forth something that her hypothesis does not cover (with the children). If someone puts forth a claim, it deserves to be scrutinized. And I do admit I have a bias towards the research but it is no way dogmatic. I'm not saying she's wrong BECAUSE it goes against research. Only I trust the research slightly more. She can research her claim just as well as other people.