It is both. We are saying the same general things in your first lengthy post and you lost the plot in the second one. To focus on the subject matter of the example instead of the example itself is you being intentionally obtuse and seemed like a straw man argument. I didn’t fully engage because your first post said exactly what I meant and your second post was a waste of time to respond if you were going to continue to respond to trivial parts of an example. Correlation isn’t causation is cliche? Why would I respond to you with anyone thought out? How do I respond to this? Does something being used often mean it’s untrue? I know you know this isn’t the case because you say so but I thought I’d pick apart this small aspect of your response like you did with penis size in mine. I have a severe stutter, have since I was little. Stuttering isn’t trivial and has caused me immense trauma which has taken decades to treat and overcome. I corrected a universal statement and then people jumped on my shit. You can respond to this if you want but I’m finished engaging.